Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC

Oral argument

• Argued

  37 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f a product’s label 19 complies with the Act, then the Act preempts any state-law claim that the product is mislabeled.”
• “And the fact that defendants may have exclusive control and possession of 5 critical facts—like their own product inventory—cannot categorically prevent plaintiffs from 6 stating a plausible claim.”
• “And the fact that 8 defendants may have exclusive control and possession of critical facts—like their own product 9 inventory—cannot categorically prevent plaintiffs from stating a plausible claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Kelly Park v. Karen Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-03-14· cited 306×
• Eclectic Properties East, LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-07· cited 296×
• Xechem, Inc., and Xechem International, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-06-23· cited 226×
• Farm Raised Salmon Cases
  California Supreme Court· 2008-02-11· cited 181×
• James Kroessler v. Cvs Health Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-10-09· cited 87×
• Garber v. Lego
  Third Circuit· 1993-12-16· cited 51×
• Tucker Durnford v. Musclepharm Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-10-12· cited 50×
• Donald Lusnak v. Bank of America
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-03-02· cited 49×
• April Bain v. California Teachers Ass'n
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-06-11· cited 48×
• Salazar v. Honest Tea, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2014-06-10· cited 17×
• Elena Nacarino v. Kashi Company
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-08-14· cited 10×
• Darlene Hollins v. Walmart Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-05-11· cited 6×