Scheib v. Keystone Residential Props., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that injury may even be based on \psychic or emotional harm\
• finding bare allegations of interest in development opportunities and exploratory studies without any \concrete plans to enter into a development agreement\ or \serious attempts at negotiation\ to be insufficient
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that it was harmed by and therefore had standing to challenge a statute because the alleged harm was “unsupported by the text of the Act”
• harm alleged from barriers to public contract bidding “not sufficiently imminent” where complaint did not plead concrete plans to bid on a particular contract
• alleged injury must be ““‘particularized’ to plaintiff, rather than ‘conjectural or hypothetical’” (citations omitted)
• plaintiffs suffered a concrete harm where they were put at a competitive disadvantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).