Scheerer v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an alien could not prevail on a due process claim because he had no constitutionally protected interest in the BIA’s granting of his motion to reopen or in the adjustment of his immigration status
• holding that an alien could not prevail on a due process claim because he had no constitutionally protected interest in the BIA’s granting of his motion to reopen or in the adjustment of his immigration status
• concluding petitioner could not establish due process violation based on BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen
• recognizing a petitioner can not establish a due process violation based on the denial of a motion to reopen
• explaining that the denial of a motion to reconsider and motion to reopen are discretionary decisions that cannot support a due pro- cess claim
• finding that arriving aliens generally must file their adjustment applications with USCIS rather than before an Immigration Judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).