Scheall v. Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A co-defendant . . . did not join in the petition for removal and the petition was thus procedurally defective.”
• “A co-defendant . . . did not join in the petition for removal and the petition was thus procedurally defective.”
• “A co-defendant . . . did not join in the petition for removal and the petition was thus procedurally defective.”
• “Plaintiff filed proofs of service related to the Non-Appearing Defendants on January 8, 2022, suggesting all three had been served via their putative registered agent.”
• “The party seeking removal has the burden of showing the propriety of removal.”
• “It is well established that removal generally requires unanimity among the defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).