Schaubel v. Bache

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court held that “[s]ince [the] interrogatory ... basically seeks to elicit such specificity in identifying certain documents rather than a compilation of information, this is clearly not a situation in which [Rule 33(d) ] may properly be used.”
• discussing Fed. R. Civ. P

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).