· 3/7/1985
Schatz v. Jockey Club Phase III, Ltd.
Citations
- 604 F. Supp. 537
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the purpose of the Act, which is to protect the consumer, would be thwarted if the purchaser were required to show actual injury in order to rescind
- noting that such an obligation was no different from that which the Act itself already imposed upon the seller
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spellman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.