Schars v. Barnd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony sufficed to show that a surveillance system and the video it produced was reliable for purposes of authentication
• testimony was sufficient to show that a surveillance system and the video it produced was reliable for purposes of authentication
• “[I]n cases of indirect criminal contempt, ‘it must be shown that the alleged contemnor intended to defy the court.’”
• discussing methods of authenticating video recordings
• discussing methods of authenticating video recordings
• discussing methods of authenticating video recordings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).