Schantz v. BAHRY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where township ordinance vacated road as a public road and established it as a private road, landowner had the right to access private road that crossed neighbor’s land but access was limited to only that area within the road’s right-of-way
• finding that where township ordinance vacated road as a public road and established it as a (Footnote continued on next page…) JKH - 3 to the Adamses’ property on Star Road when the Board conducted its view. (R.R. at 66a, N.T. at 27-28; R.R. at 82a, N.T. at 43.
• finding that where township ordinance vacated road as a public road and established it as a (Footnote continued on next page…) JKH - 3 to the Adamses’ property on Star Road when the Board conducted its view. (R.R. at 66a, N.T. at 27-28; R.R. at 82a, N.T. at 43.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).