Schantz v. Anheuser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two separate criminal episodes do not constitute the same offense within the meaning of the double jeopardy clauses
• overlap in time of two investigations, and subsequent presentments, concerning appellant was not dispositive and temporal relationship did not lead to conclusion they were part of the same criminal episode where appellant simultaneously participated in two different drug organizations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).