Skip to main content
· 7/26/1995

Schall v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

Citations

  • 37 Cal. App. 4th 1485
  • 44 Cal. Rptr. 191
  • 44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 191
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6787
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 11637
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 834
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,693
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting hypnotically refreshed memories are useful in therapy, but generally inadmissible in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Premo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.