· 7/26/1995
Schall v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.
Citations
- 37 Cal. App. 4th 1485
- 44 Cal. Rptr. 191
- 44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 191
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6787
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 11637
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 834
- 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,693
- 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting hypnotically refreshed memories are useful in therapy, but generally inadmissible in court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Premo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.