Schalk v. Michigan Sewer Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not err in calculating the amount of costs taxed against the workers’ compensation insurance carrier based upon the benefits already paid and future benefits
• holding “the employee is entitled to a pro rata counsel fee measured by the amount of the employer’s liability to him for compensation whether the compensation has been paid or not”
• holding \the employee is entitled to a pro rata counsel fee measured by the amount of the employer's liability to him for compensation whether the compensation has been paid or not\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).