Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing, in the FMLA context, that “[b]eing on leave does not insulate an employee from being terminated for misconduct”
• finding no jurisdiction where the case before the MCAD focused exclusively on events in “mid-2008,” making it “unreasonable” for the MCAD to uncover facts related to claims that occurred outside of that timeframe
• employee’s statements to his supervisor about a “stressful child custody situation and being depressed or ‘losing it’ ” created a genuine' issue of material fact as to employer’s knowledge of plaintiffs disability
• plaintiff was not a \qualified handicapped person” because his \excessive and personal use of his company-issued cell phone,” in violation of his employer’s policy, prevented him from performing the essential functions of his job
• listing elements for interference claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).