Skip to main content

Schaffer v. State

Citations

  • 583 S.W.2d 627
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the “statute is clear as to the precure to be used” once a defendant is returned to the committing court
  • abating appeal for trial court to make retrospective judicial determination of competency
  • abating an appeal because the record did not contain a judgment, order, docket sheet entry, or other evidence that the trial court ever made a determination of competency after the appellant's return from a mental health facility.
  • “What may be obvious to the State is lacking in the record.”
  • “Since there was no judicial determination of appellant’s competency to stand trial prior to the trial on the merits after he had earlier been found incompetent to stand trial by a verdict of a jury, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.”
  • requiring additional evidence that trial court made competency finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Onion, Roberts, Clinton, Odom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.