Skip to main content
· 4/3/1961

Schaffer v. Lopinto

Citations

  • 128 So. 2d 467
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “remand[ing] to the agency for further consideration of the evidence”
  • “remand[ing] to the agency for further consideration of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, McBride, Samuel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.