Schaffer v. Covington Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1189
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in finding that an appeal under R.C. 3319.081(C) was timely filed when the evidence established that the appeal was filed nine days after the Board's decision was received by certified mail. The trial court erred in finding that the Board's decision was unconstitutional where the Board's pre-termination notice provided the discharged employee with sufficient notice of the charges against him. The cause will be remanded to give the trial court an opportunity to review whether the Board's decision was illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or unsupported by the preponderance of substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. Judgment reversed and remanded.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “nothing inconsistent with the jury’s having found . . . that the defendant fired the weapon . . . towards the bar . . . and that he also fully intended to frighten its bartender at the same time, and with the same shots”
- sufficient malice demonstrated by defendant’s firing handgun into bar in order to frighten bartender
- sufficient malice demonstrated by defendant's firing handgun into bar to frighten bartender
- defendant properly convicted of assault by means of a dangerous weapon and malicious destruction of property on the basis of a single gunshot despite his argument that he could not have had the “specific intent to do two mutually exclusive acts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.