Skip to main content
· 4/28/2005

Schafer v. JLC Food Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 695 N.W.2d 570
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 216
  • 2005 WL 984474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Permitting the use of circumstantial evidence in [defective-food-products] cases is consistent with our jurisprudence on the use of circumstantial evidence to infer negligence in other contexts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.