Schaeffler Italia S.R.L. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Chevron analysis to interpret terms “reasonable number of exporters or producers” and “large number of exporters or producers”
• hold- ing that “a reasonable number of exporters or producers must be greater than one”
• hold- ing that “a reasonable number of exporters or producers must be greater than one”
• “Plainly, the voluntary respondent request was unlikely to have been approved had Schaeffler not withdrawn it, but Commerce did not close the door entirely on the prospect that Schaeffler Italia might be exam ined”
• “[Plaintiffs do not qualify for a remand order in this form,, having withdrawn their request for voluntary respondent status during the review and -thereby failing to exhaust their administrative remedies on the individual examination issue.”
• same; two respondents is not a “large number”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).