Schaefer v. Burnstine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that owner of servient estate could not install a gate on easement property because it interfered with dominant estate’s right-of-way
• holding that owner of servient estate could not install a gate on easement property because it interfered with dominant estate’s right-of-way
• “The rule obtaining in this State is that the owner of a right of way for ingress and egress has the right to use the full width of the area or strip having definite boundaries, unhampered by obstructions placed thereon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).