Skip to main content
· 2/21/1966

Schack v. Simpson

Citations

  • 383 U.S. 904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s entitlement to qualified immunity would not be precluded where the “violation of the intra-departmental regulation would not have given rise to a cause of action for damages under either federal or Michigan law” at the time of violation
  • “It is a clear rule of this circuit that if a plaintiff has not stated a federal claim, his pendant state law claims should be dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.