Schaar v. Lehigh Valley Health Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that some medical evidence 26 is necessary to show that the incapacitation was “due to” the serious health condition.
• holding that some 21 medical evidence is necessary to show that 22 the incapacitation was “due to” the serious health condition.
• holding that some medical evidence is necessary to 8 show that the incapacitation was “due to” 9 the serious health condition.
• finding employee had demonstrated three days of incapacity by producing a doctor’s note excusing her from two days of work and testifying that she was incapacitated for an additional two days
• finding genuine issue of material fact regarding whether plaintiff qualified for FMLA leave based on expert medical testimony that plaintiff was incapacitated for two days and plaintiff’s lay testimony that she was incapacitated for additional two days
• interpreting “incapacity” as it relates to inpatient care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).