Skip to main content
· 11/7/1896

Scatena v. California Cannery Co.

Citations

  • 115 Cal. 14
  • 46 P. 737
  • 1896 Cal. LEXIS 963

Syllabus

<p>Counterclaim—Demurrer Sustained on Motion op Defendant—Exclusion of Evidence—Review upon Appeal.—Where a demurrer to a counterclaim is sustained on motion for the defendant, the defendant cannot complain of such ruling upon appeal, and, after the sustaining of such demurrer, there being no issue upon the counterclaim, it is not error to reject evidence proffered in support thereof.</p>

Judges: Searls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.