Scary v. Philadelphia Gas Works

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that class representative had standing under CEA where it purchased one or more of the contracts at issue during the class period and was injured as a result of defendants' manipulative conduct
• explaining that corners and squeezes are “by no means [the] exclusive” “situations in which manipulative intent may be inferred”
• finding superiority where the potential class was estimated at over one thousand, the claims would otherwise be uneconomical to litigate, and judicial resources would be used most efficiently by certifying the class to resolve the common issues presented by the case
• “Other courts considering class certification for price 9The parties dispute whether loss causation is an element of a Section 9(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).