Skip to main content
· 5/7/1909

Scarsdale Publishing Co. v. Carter

Citations

  • 116 N.Y.S. 731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction without first addressing subject matter jurisdiction because personal jurisdiction issue was “straightforward”
  • dismissing claims brought in Illinois by a resident plaintiff who was prescribed allegedly dangerous medicine in Ohio and Wisconsin
  • “Federal district courts thus have discretion to dismiss a removed case for lack of personal jurisdiction without first making a subject-matter jurisdiction determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.