Scarola v. New York State Division of Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that potentially prejudicial testimony by a detective did not warrant a mistrial because it “could have been cured by an appropriate explanation or cautionary -5- J-S63037-15 instruction.”
• defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation
• defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation
• defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).