Scarola v. INS. CO. OF N. AMER.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had an insurable interest in a car which he paid value for without knowledge that it was stolen and which he was in possession of at the time of the loss, despite the fact that the rightful owner could emerge and assert superior title to the vehicle
• innocent purchaser of stolen car has insurable interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).