· 2/14/1995
Scarborough v. Superior Court
Citations
- 889 P.2d 641
- 181 Ariz. 283
- 184 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing written presentence reports, “not necessarily” subject to disclosure and subject to Rule 17.4(g), from victim impact statements made orally in open court and not subject to Rule 17.4(g)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Contreras, Toci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.