Skip to main content
· 2/14/1995

Scarborough v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 889 P.2d 641
  • 181 Ariz. 283
  • 184 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing written presentence reports, “not necessarily” subject to disclosure and subject to Rule 17.4(g), from victim impact statements made orally in open court and not subject to Rule 17.4(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Contreras, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.