Scarborough v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is for [the court] to ... determine and craft the appropriate remedy.”
• “As every first year law student learns, one of the central tenets of contract law is that a contract must be reasonably definite in its terms to be enforceable.”
• “As every first year law student learns, one of the central tenets of contract law is that a contract must be reasonably definite in its terms to be enforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• VICI Racing, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2014-08-13· cited 67×
• Aveta Inc. v. Bengoa
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2009-12-24· cited 39×
• Chavous v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-06-26· cited 25×
• Vici Racing, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2013-02-08· cited 6×
• State v. LaCombe
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2016-10-25
• State v. Coverdale
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-04-18
• Belair v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2021-10-04
• Riverside Risk Advisors LLC v. Grace I Ching Chao
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-10-26
• Riverside Risk Advisors LLC v. Grace I. Ching Chao
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-10-28
• Medley v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-12-10