Skip to main content
· 5/2/2003

Scarberry v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corp

Citations

  • 328 F.3d 1255
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8449
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,412
  • 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1320
  • 2003 WL 2008201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment in favor of employer when employer identified culprit of inappropriate graffiti and terminated his employment
  • “[I]f we required employers to ... impose excessive discipline, employers would inevitably face claims from the other direction of violations of due process rights and wrongful termination.”
  • discussing an employer’s response to first-time harrassers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Baldock, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.