· 5/2/2003
Scarberry v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corp
Citations
- 328 F.3d 1255
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8449
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,412
- 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1320
- 2003 WL 2008201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment in favor of employer when employer identified culprit of inappropriate graffiti and terminated his employment
- “[I]f we required employers to ... impose excessive discipline, employers would inevitably face claims from the other direction of violations of due process rights and wrongful termination.”
- discussing an employer’s response to first-time harrassers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Baldock, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.