Scarano v. Schnoor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a court properly sustained objections to a question of defendant on whether, on basis of what he knew after one operation, he would have performed the operation because negligence is not to be determined by hindsight or by what a party subsequently learns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rickett v. Hayes
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1974-07-08· cited 19×
• Cathey v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-10-27· cited 17×
• St. Mary Medical Center v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-11-19· cited 10×
• County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-11-05· cited 9×
• Johnston v. Brother
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-03-23· cited 9×
• Estate of Calway
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-10-13· cited 5×
• Black v. Caruso
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-12-08· cited 3×
• Moorehead v. Pope
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-10-13· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lashley v. Koerber
  California Supreme Court· 1945-02-20· cited 65×
• Sim v. Weeks
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-05-16· cited 43×
• Gluckstein v. Lipsett
  California Court of Appeal· 1949-08-19· cited 26×
• McNamara v. Emmons
  California Court of Appeal· 1939-12-21· cited 19×
• Sansom v. Ross-Loos Medical Group
  California Court of Appeal· 1943-03-08· cited 12×
• Friedman v. Dresel
  California Court of Appeal· 1956-02-20· cited 8×