· 11/23/2004
Scaramuzza v. Sciolla
Citations
- 345 F. Supp. 2d 508
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973
- 2004 WL 2697721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to dismiss the action where the plaintiffs failure to timely file a COM would have been excused under a liberally-construed opening of judgment of non pros analysis
- ”[T]he Pennsylvania certificate of merit rule will be applied by this Court as controlling, substantive state law.’’
- “Although the court believes the 60-day time limit is binding on a plaintiff, the defendant in this case has not shown prejudice from the delay, and the court will not dismiss the complaint.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baylson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.