Skip to main content
· 11/23/2004

Scaramuzza v. Sciolla

Citations

  • 345 F. Supp. 2d 508
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973
  • 2004 WL 2697721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to dismiss the action where the plaintiffs failure to timely file a COM would have been excused under a liberally-construed opening of judgment of non pros analysis
  • ”[T]he Pennsylvania certificate of merit rule will be applied by this Court as controlling, substantive state law.’’
  • “Although the court believes the 60-day time limit is binding on a plaintiff, the defendant in this case has not shown prejudice from the delay, and the court will not dismiss the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baylson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.