· 10/7/2013
Scantland v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 233
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 173
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3185
- 571 U.S. 897
- 2013 WL 3357059
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under Miller-El II and Snyder the federal habeas court was required to consider the comparative analysis no matter that the petitioner did not identify comparators at trial
- \We recently agreed that Miller-El II requires us to consider a 'comparative juror analysis' in a Batson claim.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.