Skip to main content
· 4/23/2004

Scanner Technologies Corporation v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation, N.V.

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 1299
  • 70 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1900
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8108
  • 2004 WL 868404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim construction “begins and ends” with a claim’s actual words
  • concluding district court erred in construing “the apparatus comprising: an illumination apparatus” to permit only a single light source
  • “The use of the transitional phrase ‘comprising’ ... indicates that the elements or steps following the transition may be supplemented by additional elements or steps and still fall within the scope of the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.