Skip to main content
· 7/2/1982

Scanlon v. Tokarcik

Citations

  • 458 U.S. 1121
  • 102 S. Ct. 3508
  • 73 L. Ed. 2d 1383
  • 50 U.S.L.W. 3998
  • 1982 U.S. LEXIS 2882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that post-it notes should not be used because they may be easily overlooked or dislodged
  • noting that doctrine applies “where parties are represented by separate counsel but engage in a common legal enterprise”
  • explaining that for common-interest exception to apply parties “must have demonstrated cooperation in formulating a common legal strategy”
  • notwithstanding a waiver of attorney-client privilege, documents may still be protected as work product because waiver principles applicable to attorney-client privilege are not identical to those applicable to work product
  • “[T]he doctrine applies where parties are represented by separate counsel but engage in a common legal enterprise.”
  • “privilege is waived with respect to [inadvertently disclosed] documents only if the [disclosing] party failed to take reasonable steps to maintain their confidentiality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.