· 7/2/1982
Scanlon v. Tokarcik
Citations
- 458 U.S. 1121
- 102 S. Ct. 3508
- 73 L. Ed. 2d 1383
- 50 U.S.L.W. 3998
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 2882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that post-it notes should not be used because they may be easily overlooked or dislodged
- noting that doctrine applies “where parties are represented by separate counsel but engage in a common legal enterprise”
- explaining that for common-interest exception to apply parties “must have demonstrated cooperation in formulating a common legal strategy”
- notwithstanding a waiver of attorney-client privilege, documents may still be protected as work product because waiver principles applicable to attorney-client privilege are not identical to those applicable to work product
- “[T]he doctrine applies where parties are represented by separate counsel but engage in a common legal enterprise.”
- “privilege is waived with respect to [inadvertently disclosed] documents only if the [disclosing] party failed to take reasonable steps to maintain their confidentiality.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.