Scanlon v. M v. Super Servant 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court denied as untimely motion to amend order to certify for interlocutory appeal filed more than four months after order issued
• “[I]t is possible for a party to consent to a judgment and still preserve [its] right to appeal a previous ruling on a contested matter in the case, as long as it reserve[s] that right unequivocally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).