Skip to main content
· 4/6/2006

Scanlin v. Utica First Insurance

Citations

  • 426 F. Supp. 2d 243
  • 2006 WL 936145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issue is not separate civil action if, among other things, its resolution requires “interpretation of an order previously entered by the state court”
  • fact that parties interested in removed matter are same as parties in state court case suggests that removed matter is merely ancillary to state case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kosik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.