Skip to main content
· 1/12/2010

Scanlan v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan

Citations

  • 678 F. Supp. 2d 110
  • 48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1712
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2217
  • 2010 WL 104691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the plaintiff’s “threatened injury” of “potential tax consequences” was “neither concrete nor imminent, but relies upon an extended series of hypothetical events”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David G. Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.