Skip to main content
· 9/13/1985

Scandia Down Corporation, a California Corporation, and Goose Down, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Euroquilt, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation

Citations

  • 772 F.2d 1423
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 195
  • 227 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 138
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23104
  • 54 U.S.L.W. 2220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “corporations must appear by counsel or not at all”
  • Upholding an injunction while noting that “[t]here are millions of possible [lawful alternatives to the prohibited conduct] to which [defendant] could have turned. Any effort to identify and prohibit one million of them would have left another million or more subject to dispute.”
  • “A corporation may not grant itself a continuance by manipulating things so that it has no counsel.”
  • “When the difficulty stems from the inability of words to describe the variousness of experience, the court may prefer brief imprecise standards to prolix imprecise standards.”
  • “When the difficulty stems from the inability of words to describe the variousness of experience, the court may prefer brief imprecise standards to prolix imprecise standards.”
  • “When the difficulty stems from the inability of words to describe the variousness of experience, the court may prefer brief imprecise standards to prolix imprecise standards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.