Scan-Plast Industries, Inc. v. Scanimport America Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, because of the “other combinations [of colors and numbers] defendants could have used [to identify the product parts]” in their brochures, “[the defendant’s] ability to compete would not be hindered by extending protection to these features [in the plaintiffs’ brochures]”
• “ ‘[t]he test of customer confusion is not whether the products can be differentiated when subjected to a side-by-side comparison, but rather whether they create the same general overall impression’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).