Scally v. Flannery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proposal to bargain over effects of job terminations, normally a mandatory subject, held non-mandatory because union \could not bargain away any part of the rights that accrued to employees under the [arbitral] Award\
• proposal to bargain over effects of job terminations, normally a mandatory subject, held non-mandatory because union \could not bargain away any part of the rights that accrued to employees under the [arbitral] Award\
• “That principle of accommodation means that actions to enjoin violations of the Railway Labor Act may be maintained without regard to Section 4 of the Norris-La Guardia Act, and yet be subject to Section 8 of that Act.”
• labor agreements “in force continued in effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).