SCA Construction Supply v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining ”[t]he purpose of the rule is to enable the courts to determine the rights of all parties to a controversy in one lawsuit, if possible”
• Arizona Supreme Court declined to follow Federal Act where there was no federal counterpart to the Arizona rule in question, and federal case law was thus inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).