Skip to main content
· 2/23/2001

S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., v. the Clorox Company

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 232
  • 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1912
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that depiction of leaking plastic bag was false where rate at which bag leaked in advertisement was faster than rate tests indicated
  • acknowledging that a reviewing court may consider the context in which a preliminary injunction was issued to determine whether it is sufficiently specific
  • “[U]nder Rule 65(d) [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure], an injunction must be more specific than a simple command that the defendant obey the law.” (first alteration in original) (quoting Peregrine Myan. Ltd. v. Segal, 89 F.3d 41, 51 (2d Cir. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Pooler, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.