SC FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS. CO. v. Mumford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because South Carolina law mandates liability coverage without a distinction between intentional and negligent actions giving rise to liability, it plainly does not permit an exclusion
• holding a provision that excluded third party liability coverage for “intentional acts” was invalid because (1) it contravened the minimum limits requirement; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).