SC DSS Ex Rel. Texas v. Holden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting our courts will interpret statutes so as to promote legislative intent and escape absurd results
• finding no due process violation when a party was afforded \a meaningful opportunity to be heard\
• finding the mother was not equitably estopped from seeking child support and arrearages when there was evidence that she consistently asked the father to pay support and the father presented no evidence that he changed his position in reliance on the alleged agreement
• where mother continually asked father to pay child support, no unreasonable delay established for laches
• where mother continually asked father to pay child support, no unreasonable delay established for laches
• where father obtained six month continuance to depose mother but failed to do so, his due process right was not violated through admission of mother’s affidavit rather than live testimony in child enforcement proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).