S.C. and R.P. v. K.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking down annexation statute because neither “the need to preserve rural land around urban areas” nor the need to “prevent!] competing cities ... from annexing each other’s land” was unique
• striking down annexation statute because neither “the need to preserve rural land around urban areas” nor the need to “prevent[] competing cities . . . from annexing each other’s land” was unique
• striking annexation statute applicable only to St. Joseph County because neither \the need to preserve rural land around urban areas\ nor the need to prevent competing cities from annexing each other's land was unique to that county
• addressing the merits of a challenge under Article 4, Section 23 by the city of South Bend to a law applicable only to St. Joseph County allowing a majority of landowners in an affected area of the county to block annexation by a municipality
• “Hoovler made clear that a defining characteristic (a population category) that is theoretically unrelated to the justifying characteristic (Superfund liability
• “Hoovler made clear that a defining characteristic (a population category) that is theoretically unrelated to the justifying characteristic (Superfund liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).