Skip to main content
· 7/22/1991

SBR Realty Corp. v. Pave-Mark Corp.

Citations

  • 175 A.D.2d 240
  • 572 N.Y.S.2d 705
  • 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Immigration Judges have a “duty” to resolve immigration proceedings “in an expeditious manner”
  • observing that Immigration Judges have a “duty” to resolve immigration proceedings “in an expeditious manner”
  • explaining that “neither the immigration judge nor the Board” have jurisdiction over the DHS’s exercise of “prosecutorial discretion”
  • noting that termination is not a proper means to delay an alien’s deportation
  • “the fact that the respondent has an approved visa petition does not entitle him to delay the completion of deportation proceedings pending availability of a visa number”
  • “[T]he fact that the respondent has an approved visa petition does not entitle him to delay the completion of deportation proceedings pending availability of a visa number.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.