· 7/22/1991
SBR Realty Corp. v. Pave-Mark Corp.
Citations
- 175 A.D.2d 240
- 572 N.Y.S.2d 705
- 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that Immigration Judges have a “duty” to resolve immigration proceedings “in an expeditious manner”
- observing that Immigration Judges have a “duty” to resolve immigration proceedings “in an expeditious manner”
- explaining that “neither the immigration judge nor the Board” have jurisdiction over the DHS’s exercise of “prosecutorial discretion”
- noting that termination is not a proper means to delay an alien’s deportation
- “the fact that the respondent has an approved visa petition does not entitle him to delay the completion of deportation proceedings pending availability of a visa number”
- “[T]he fact that the respondent has an approved visa petition does not entitle him to delay the completion of deportation proceedings pending availability of a visa number.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.