Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if statements of the Missouri Supreme Court were only dicta, they were still persuasive authority to the district court applying Missouri law
• concluding the circumstances demonstrated “substantial ground for difference of opinion” where the parties presented “no less than four [competing] legal theories” for liability
• deciding what legal standard the court should apply in order to hold an institution liable under Title IX was undoubtedly a question of law
• noting “the question of institutional liability” under Title IX presented a controlling question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).