SB v. Saint James School

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 16 a dean’s disclosure of private information to those involved in the investigatory process 17 did not constitute publicity for purposes of a false light claim.
• stating that general propositions of law are not considered \supporting authority\ for purposes of Rule 28
• overruled on other grounds, as recognized in Flickinger v. King, 385 So. 3d 504, 517 (Ala. 2023)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).