S.B. v. Cleburne County Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “only in the most exceptional circumstances have courts concluded that a duty is discharged because additional financial burdens make performance less practical than initially contemplated”
• holding that in the absence of a claim of impossibility of performance, fraud or other extraordinary circumstances, a party to a contract may not unilaterally change the agreement because circumstances have changed to his detriment
• explaining that impracticability doctrine is governed by multifactor test and that reviewing court need not address all prongs of test if court concludes that party failed to establish any prong
• stating \[a]ny legal conclusions reached by an attorney trial referee have no conclusive effect\
• stating \[a]ny legal conclusions reached by an attorney trial referee have no conclusive effect\
• stating \[a]ny legal conclusions reached by an attorney trial referee have no conclusive effect\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).