Sayyah v. Farquharson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)'s administrative exhaustion requirement applies in habeas proceedings where a noncitizen seeks review of his final removal order
• holding that a “claim[ of] indefinite detention . . . was mooted by [a petitioner’s] subsequent release”
• noting that BIA has authority to address petitioner’s claim of bias and misconduct by Immigration Judge
• noting that alien’s release mooted the alien’s habeas challenge to continued detention
• “[Petitioner] also claimed indefinite detention, but this claim was mooted by his 17 subsequent release.”’
• “[W]e hold that section 1252(d)’s exhaustion requirement applies broadly to all forms of court review of final orders of removal, including habeas corpus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).