Sayer v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was reversible error to permit the jury to take a mechanical jack, not introduced into evidence, into the jury room
• holding it was reversible error to permit the jury to take a mechanical jack, not introduced into evidence, into the jury room
• jury should not have been permitted to take into jury room, in negligence case, a mechanical jack which had never been introduced into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).